Bible Review
Bible Review opens the realm of Biblical scholarship to a non-academic audience. World-renown scholars detail the latest in Biblical interpretation and why it matters. These important pieces are paired with stunning art, which makes the text come to life before your eyes. Anyone interested in the Bible should read this seminal magazine.
Endnote 6 - Who Wrote the Gospel of Luke?
The quotation is taken from Hobart’s cumbersome subtitle to The Medical Language of St. Luke: A Proof from Internal Evidence that “The Gospel according to St. Luke” and “The Acts of the Apostles” Were Written by the Same Person, and that the Writer was a Medical Man (1882; reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1954). Hobart’s thesis was supported by the eminent scholar Adolf von Harnack (Luke the Physician, trans. J.R. Wilkinson [New York: Putnam, 1909]).
Endnote 5 - Who Wrote the Gospel of Luke?
See especially John Knox, Chapters in a Life of Paul, revised by the author and edited with introduction by D. R. A. Hare (Macon, GA: Mercer Univ. Press, 1987), and Paul Vielhauer, “On the ‘Paulinism’ of Acts,” in Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert, ed. Leander E. Keck and J. Louis Martyn (Nashville: Abingdon, 1966), pp. 33–50.
Endnote 4 - Who Wrote the Gospel of Luke?
Endnote 3 - Who Wrote the Gospel of Luke?
Endnote 2 - Who Wrote the Gospel of Luke?
See esp. Charles H. Talbert, Literary Patterns, Theological Themes, and the Genre of Luke-Acts, Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series (SBLMS) 20 (Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1974); I. Howard Marshall, “Acts and the ‘Former Treatise,’” The Book of Acts in Its Ancient Literary Setting (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993), pp. 163–182.
Endnote 1 - Who Wrote the Gospel of Luke?
Endnote 1 - The Shape of Justification
Endnote 1 - Bible Books: A Postmodern Pilate
Endnote 3 - Sperm Stealing
Pages
