Bible Review

Bible Review opens the realm of Biblical scholarship to a non-academic audience. World-renown scholars detail the latest in Biblical interpretation and why it matters. These important pieces are paired with stunning art, which makes the text come to life before your eyes. Anyone interested in the Bible should read this seminal magazine.

Endnote 21 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Linnemann, Synoptic Problem? pp. 185–191; fuller discussion and citations in D.A. Carson, Douglas J. Moo, and Leon Morris, An Introduction to the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1992), pp. 66–74, 92–95, 113–115, 138–157.

Read more about Endnote 21 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Endnote 20 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Linnemann, Synoptic Problem? pp. 182–185.

Read more about Endnote 20 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Endnote 19 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Word counts from the New American Standard Version.

Read more about Endnote 19 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Endnote 18 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

John Wenham, Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke: A Fresh Assault on the Synoptic Problem (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1991), p. 54.

Read more about Endnote 18 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Endnote 17 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

In the analysis below I follow the methodology of my book cited in the previous note. To avoid defining Q myself, I follow the Griechisch-deutsche Synopse der Q-Überlieferungen, corrected only as needed to conform to the text of Aland’s Synopsis Quattuor Evangeliorum, 11th edition.

Read more about Endnote 17 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

Endnote 16 - Is There a Gospel of Q?

See Eta Linnemann, Is There a Synoptic Problem? Rethinking the Literary Dependence of the First Three Gospels, trans. by Robert W. Yarbrough (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1992), pp. 68–70.