Endnote 1 - The Storm God of Aleppo Strikes Again
Ancient Near Eastern Texts, p. 320 [cited by T. Bolen, blog.bibleplaces.com].
Biblical Archaeology Review is the flagship publication of the Biblical Archaeology Society. For more than 40 years it has been making the world of archaeology in the lands of the Bible come alive for the interested layperson. Full of vivid images and articles written by leading scholars, this is a must read for anyone interested in the archaeology of the ancient Near East.
Ancient Near Eastern Texts, p. 320 [cited by T. Bolen, blog.bibleplaces.com].
G. Beckman, Hittite Diplomatic Texts, SBL Writings from the Ancient World Series 7 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1996), pp. 105, 117.
Timothy P. Harrison, “Neo-Hittites in the ‘Land of Palistin’: Renewed Investigations at Tell Tayinat on the Plain of Antioch,” NEA 72, pp. 174–189, esp. 185. See also the 2009 seasonal excavation report available on the TAP Web site: www.utoronto.ca/tap/reports/2009Report_en.pdf.
Similar gradations are prescribed in Leviticus 4 for the purification offering (ḫaṭṭāt): The anointed priest offers a cattle (Leviticus 4:3–12); the community, a cattle (Leviticus 4:13–21); a prince, a male goat (Leviticus 4:22–26); and a commoner, a she-goat (Leviticus 4:26).
NEA 72, p. 187.
NEA 72, p. 172.
Benjamin Sass, “Taita, King of Palistin: CA. 959–900 BCE,” in Cahiers de l’Institut du Proche-Orient Ancien du College de France III (2010). See also Benjamin Sass, “Four Notes on Taita King of Palistin with an Excursis on King Solomon’s Empire,” Tel Aviv 37 (2010).
The large relief of the deity should not be considered the cult statue of the temple which would have been a free-standing, three-dimensional icon. The statue itself was undoubtedly plundered or otherwise lost at some time or other. The relief is only a two-dimensional depiction of the deity embodied in the lost statue. It is no more the cult statue than the relief of the king standing next to him is the real king.
Kay Kohlmeyer, “The Temple of the Storm God in Aleppo During the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages,” Near Eastern Archaeology (NEA) 72 (2009), pp. 190–202; Kay Kohlmeyer, Der Tempel des Wettergottes von Aleppo, Gerda Henkel Vorlesung (Münster: Rhema, 2000).
I have other disagreements with elements of Monson’s comparisons, too detailed to consider here. Suffice it to say that although I do not deny certain striking similarities between the ‘Ain Dara temple and Solomon’s Temple, it seems to me that architecturally the Tell Tayinat temple remains the closer parallel; and this holds even if we accept some of Monson’s suggestions including some similarity between the corridor and the yāṣîa‘ and ṣelā‘ot.