Endnote 12 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
Guy G. Stroumsa, “Comments on Charles Hedrick’s Article: A Testimony,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 11 (2003), p. 147, at p. 149.
Biblical Archaeology Review
Biblical Archaeology Review is the flagship publication of the Biblical Archaeology Society. For more than 40 years it has been making the world of archaeology in the lands of the Bible come alive for the interested layperson. Full of vivid images and articles written by leading scholars, this is a must read for anyone interested in the archaeology of the ancient Near East.
Endnote 11 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
Bart Ehrman, Lost Christianities (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2003), pp. 77–78.
Endnote 10 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
Ernest Best, review of Pryke, Redactional Style, in the Journal for the Study of the New Testament 4, p. 69, cited in Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark: A Commentary, pp. 490–491.
Endnote 9 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
Scott G. Brown, “The Letter to Theodore: Stephen Carlson’s Case Against Clement Authorship,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 16 (2008), p. 535, at p. 569.
Endnote 8 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
Ronald Thisted and Bradley Efron, “Did Shakespeare Write a Newly-Discovered Poem?” Biometrika 74 (1987), p. 445.
Endnote 7 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
Bart Ehrman, “Response to Charles Hedrick’s Stalemate,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, Vol. 4, Article 6 (2008), at p. 161.
Endnote 6 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
James Davidson (New York: Random House, 2009), reviewed in The Washington Post, June 18, 2009.
Endnote 5 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
Stephen Carlson, The Gospel Hoax, p. xvii.
Endnote 4 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
The Talmud (b. Avodah, Zarah 39b) asks what is “sal-conditum”? The answer is that it comes in black and white forms and Roman guests partake of it. In the course of the discussion, the Talmud explains why Jews may not partake of it: because sometimes “unclean [that is, unkosher, that is, fish without scales—see Leviticus 11:9–12 and Deuteronomy 14:9–10] black fish are mixed with them” (emphasis supplied).
Endnote 3 - “Secret Mark”: Restoring a Dead Scholar’s Reputation
The word used in the Mishnah is “salt [melach] sal-conditum.” For some inexplicable reason, the word melach is omitted from both the Danby and Neusner translations of the Mishnah. Jacob Neusner, The Mishnah, Avodah Zara 2, 6 (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1988), p. 664. It is there in the Hebrew text, however, not only here, but elsewhere when this kind of salt or salt similar to it is referred to.
Pages
