Bible Review

Bible Review opens the realm of Biblical scholarship to a non-academic audience. World-renown scholars detail the latest in Biblical interpretation and why it matters. These important pieces are paired with stunning art, which makes the text come to life before your eyes. Anyone interested in the Bible should read this seminal magazine.

Endnote 17 - The Arian Controversy—How It Divided Early Christianity

Guiseppi Bovini, Ravena Felix (Ravenna: Edizioni A. Longo, 1957), p. 31. Though the Arian baptistery is not explicitly mentioned in the list of structures “reconciled” to the Catholic Church by Bishop Agnellus in 561 C.E., Sant’Apollinare Nuovo is, and clearly figures in the Orthodox damnatio: Reiner Sörries, Die Bilder der Orthodoxen, pp. 24, 57, 72.

Endnote 12 - The Arian Controversy—How It Divided Early Christianity

Zeev Rubin, in “The Conversion of the Visigoths to Christianity,” Museum Helveticum 38 (1981), pp. 34–54, has sustained this date and reaffirmed E. A. Thompson’s picture of the social situation of the Goths at this juncture of history. Rubin’s position is reported in the text following this note. I am grateful to Gideon Bohak of Princeton University for this reference.

Endnote 10 - The Arian Controversy—How It Divided Early Christianity

The present text of the Creed of Constantinople was preserved and transmitted to us by the Council of Chalcedon (451 C.E.) and can be found in Richard A. Norris, Jr., The Christological Controversy, Sources of Christian Thought (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980), p. 157. For scholarly discussions as to whether this creed actually derives from the Council of Constantinople, see Hanson, Search for the Christian Doctrine (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1988), pp. 812–815.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Bible Review